RSS.Social

Scientist Sees Squirrel

follow: @[email protected]

Posts

Dark taxa, species naming, and inclusivity in science

Broadening our writing, and mentoring, BASE

We are all “developing writers”

I’d cheerfully double my taxes to have a well-funded society

Formalizing and deformalizing academic writing – with and without AI tools

Friday Link: Marlene Zuk on scientists as writers

The curious case of the self-publishing scientist

Friday Link: How to do good science

The OTHER kind of review that really gets my goat

Four kinds of writing “errors”, and how you might respond when you spot them

The piece of writing that just won’t die

The #1 translatable science superpower: knowing what you don’t know

‘The Ecology of Ecologists’: what, if anything, is ecology? (book review)

On a two-word scientific paper, and a fascinating (heated) exchange

Wonderful Latin names: Jynx torquilla

Whatever happened to MOOCs? – and why education doesn’t need revolutionizing

Cover reveal: the 3rd edition ‘Scientist’s Guide to Writing’ is getting closer!

Adapting mentoring to, and with, the developing writer

How to lead a journal club you won’t be embarrassed by later

Three stages of manuscript development – and why they matter to you as a mentor

It’s publication day! “Teaching and Mentoring Writers in the Sciences”

Latin Names for Gardeners, Part 4: Four major themes for plant names

Latin Names for Gardeners, Part 3: Who gives a plant its name?

Latin Names for Gardeners, Part 2: Latin names aren’t really Latin (they’re much more interesting than that)

Latin Names for Gardeners, Part 1: Why Latin names?

My far-too-late discovery of “science studies”

Our book is SHIPPING NOW! Here’s an easy stocking stuffer + 5 ideas for what to write on the gift tag ✨

What your Introduction section isn’t

How should you pick a PhD research topic?

“This changes everything” redux: opinions about “pathological pedantry”

Are my academic and non-academic writing styles converging? And would that be good?

The third edition of “The Scientist’s Guide to Writing” is coming your way!

Does this really change *everything*?

All the things I was never trained to do

Close encounters of the extinct kind

There’s no “I” in “peer review” – or is there?

What your Discussion section isn’t

I don’t understand graphical abstracts. So I both hate and admire this one.

Wonderful Latin Names: Karpatiosorbus admonitor

The big assumption behind loud opposition to “AI” writing tools – and its two flavours

Owls, blurbs, and a cover – oh my! “Teaching and Mentoring Writers in the Sciences” is getting close

“Ferns”: the most beautiful book I’ve held in a while

My summer of writing books – in song

Sometimes, I love to lose an argument

Wonderful Latin Names: Friendship in plant naming

Mentoring beyond the academic career