Data Colada

[128] LinkedOut: The Best Published Audit Study, And Its Interesting Shortcoming

[127] Meaningless Means #4: Correcting Scientific Misinformation

[126] Stimulus Plots

[125] "Complexity" 2: Don't be mean to the median

[124] "Complexity": 75% of participants missed comprehension questions in AER paper critiquing Prospect Theory

[123] Dear Political Scientists: The binning estimator violates ceteris paribus

[122] Arresting Flexibility: A QJE field experiment on police behavior with about 40 outcome variables

[121] Dear Political Scientists: Don't Bin, GAM Instead

[120] Off-Label Smirnov: How Many Subjects Show an Effect in Between-Subjects Experiments?

[119] A Hidden Confound in a Psych Methods Pre‑registrations Critique

[118] Harvard’s Gino Report Reveals How A Dataset Was Altered

[117] The Impersonator: The Fake Data Were Coming From Inside the Lab

[116] Our (First?) Day In Court

[115] Preregistration Prevalence

[114] Exhibits 3, 4, and 5

[113] Data Litigada: Thank You (And An Update)

[112] Data Falsificada (Part 4): "Forgetting The Words"

[111] Data Falsificada (Part 3): "The Cheaters Are Out of Order"

[110] Data Falsificada (Part 2): "My Class Year Is Harvard"

[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): "Clusterfake"

[108] MRAN is Dead, long live GRAN

[107] Meaningless Means #3: The Truth About Lies

[106] Meaningless Means #2: The Average Effect of Nudging in Academic Publications is 8.7%

[105] Meaningless Means #1: The Average Effect of Nudging Is d = .43

[104] Meaningless Means: Some Fundamental Problems With Meta-Analytic Averages

[103] Mediation Analysis is Counterintuitively Invalid

[102] R on Steroids: Running WAY faster simulations in R

[101] Transparency Makes Research Evaluable: Evaluating a Field Experiment on Crime Published in Nature

[100] Groundhog 2.0: Further addressing the threat R poses to reproducible research

[99] Hyping Fisher: The Most Cited 2019 QJE Paper Relied on an Outdated Stata Default to Conclude Regression p-values Are Inadequate

[98] Evidence of Fraud in an Influential Field Experiment About Dishonesty

[97] Data Replicada #10: Does Goal Conflict Affect Time Spent on Work and Leisure?

[96] Madam Speaker: Are Female Presenters Treated Worse in Econ Seminars?

[95] Groundhog: Addressing The Threat That R Poses To Reproducible Research

[94] Data Replicada #9: Are Progression Ads More Credible?

[93] ResearchBox: Open Research Made Easy

[92] Data Replicada #8: Is The Left-Digit Bias Stronger When Prices Are Presented Side-By-Side?

[91] p-hacking fast and slow: Evaluating a forthcoming AER paper deeming some econ literatures less trustworthy

[90] Data Replicada #7: Does Displaying Multiple Copies of a Product Increase Its Perceived Effectiveness?

[89] Data Replicada #6: The Problem of (Weird) Differential Attrition

[88] The Hot-Hand Artifact for Dummies & Behavioral Scientists

[87] Data Replicada #5: Do Human-Like Products Inspire More Holistic Judgments?

[86] The Data Colada Seminar Series

[85] Data Replicada #4: The Problem of Hidden Confounds

[84] Data Replicada #3: Does Self-Concept Uncertainty Influence Magazine Subscription Choice?

[83] Data Replicada #2: Do Self-Construal and Group Size Influence How People Make Choices on Behalf of a Group?

[82] Data Replicada #1: Do Elevated Viewpoints Increase Risk Taking?

[81] Data Replicada

[80] Interaction Effects Need Interaction Controls

[79] Experimentation Aversion: Reconciling the Evidence